#Rent receipts manual
#Rent receipts license

It is a very common scenario where a tenant is working and paying cash and at some point find themselves jobless and in need of benefits to meet the rent, which in turn requires proof of tenancy and rent level which those same usual suspects will not provide and will work at harassing the tenant out or simply changing the locks, adding homelessness to unemployment. These types of landlords and agents, Safer RentingвЂ™s вЂњUsual suspectsвЂќ, make sure that they get paid in cash as well, no bank transfers for them, for the same reasons already set out. The business model breaks down if you have to pay out any money, the aim being to bring in as much as possible, whilst spending as little as you can to maintain profit levels.

#Rent receipts license

Why would they do this? Well part of the answer lies in the avoidance of any paper trail that might lead officialdom to their door, such as local authority licensing teams, to avoid having to license and EHOs to avoid repairs and management conditions.ДЄlso, the big one for them, being HMRC because if you are a criminal landlord the last thing you want is to be paying tax on the rental income. So now, what about the ramifications of all this myth-making? What happens when a landlord refuses to give a person a tenancy agreement or any receipts for rent? Whether a tenancy or a license exists is a matter of fact or degree, not the label a landlord decides to give it. Or as I Iike to put it less articulately on training courses, вЂњIf itвЂ™s a cow it goes Moo, if itвЂ™s a pig it goes OinkвЂќ.

#Rent receipts manual

вЂњThe manufacture of a 5 pronged implement for manual digging, results in a fork, even if the manufacturer insists he has made a spadeвЂќ

So in the absence of a written contract, if the 3 hallmarks of a tenancy are satisfied, then a tenancy is what you have, not a licence and no amount of calling a вЂњTenancyвЂќ a вЂњLicenseвЂќ will make it one.

Exclusive possession, of at least one room.

Mountford, which helpfully provided everyone with the 3 hallmarks of a tenancy:. This principal was nicely enshrined in 1986 in the case of Street v. Section 54 of the Law of Property Act 1925 deals with this issue and points out that in tenancies of a lesser period and the absence of a written contract, a tenancy will still exist by virtue of the legal doctrine of вЂњParolвЂќ. I donвЂ™t think I have ever seen a 3 year tenancy in all my years. In law you donвЂ™t need a written contract to create a tenancy, unless the letting is to be more than 3 years from the outset, in which case it has to be in writing and lodged with Land Registry. These daft building blocks of fantasy weave their way into so much mischief and misery further down the line which I shall get to but first lets dispel the myths. The reasons are a little more perverse.ДЇirst of all there is the common urban myth, held by many landlords and tenants, that if you donвЂ™t have a written tenancy agreement, you wont be a tenant, followed quickly by a second urban myth, that if you donвЂ™t create a tenancy, you donвЂ™t need a possession order to evict someone.ДЄll of which is built upon yet another urban myth, that a landlord gets to choose whether to grant a tenancy or a licence. Laziness? No not at all, not even just ignorance.

It has long been common practice amongst landlords operating in the shadow private rented sector, to refuse to provide written documentation proving occupation or receipts for rent.